johnriii,
The balance between hits and Ks seems to be the biggest problem. Homers were low to ok with those sliders: 10 HRs in seven games equals 0.7 HRs each team per game. Current MLB season has the Yankees hitting 1.9 per game, Twins are worst at 0.4 per game. Possibly raising power to 80 while reducing contact to 30 give homers a little boost keeping hits in the right range.
Ok, game two Rangers-Yankees played using the latest tweaks, interesting start. I happened to check the pitch counts for the first seven games under my original sliders, the average number of pitches per team each game was 123.6. I found this article
http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/7533 which gives the average number of pitches in the MLB at 146. Ok, after 9 innings the Rangers had thrown 149, the Yankees 146! There was a better feel and pace to the game, so reducing pitch success to 55 seems to have worked. The Yankees won the game 6-5 after 10 innings, both teams finishing with 15 hits and 1 error. The hit count after 9 innings was NYY 13-12 Texas so a little higher, but each team had one drop in the outfield (sometihng I haven't seen often in this game), so error free baseball would have the count at 12-11 after 9 full innings, not dramatically more than in some of the other games. Cincy had 11 and 13 vs Philly, the Braves and Giants each had 10 in game one, while Boston had 11 and 8 vs. the Twins. The Yankees have always been one of the better hitting teams on any sliders I have tried, so we'll see how we go. After nine innings the Yankees were hitting .333, Texas .300, both increased slightly during the extra inning. Nine innings saw the Yankees 0/1 on steal attempts, they finished 1/3 overall, the Rangers were 1/1 after nine and in total. So, the hits increased slightly with the adjusted sliders, but not worryingly so. The best news was the number of Ks reduced to a more realistic figure, 7 for each team, with Texas getting one of theirs in the extra inning. BBs were NYY 4-3 Texas. It was by far the best game to watch, I'd have preferred 3 or 4 hits fewer per team and maybe a couple of homers, but not bad. It's promising, but I'll play out the rest of the LDS with these. I'm not sure if reducing pitch speed affects the CPU vs CPU but pitch success at 55 seems to have pitch counts more realistic. No HRs in this game, so I think power at 80 might be the way to, possibly reducing contact to 30 or increasing infielder speed by 5. I think we're getting as close as we will be able to get: hits between 7-10, Ks 5-9, runs 3-6, about 90% of the time would be ideal. Of course the teams I am using are contenders, it might be worth trying a few more obvious mismatches at some point. The sliders may get us close, but I guess there's always the 'pleasure' of tweaking individual player stats, wouldn't that be 'fun'? ;-)
Currently watching Philly at Cincy, top of the 5th, Philly leading 2-1, 3 hits and 4Ks each, Philly has 2 SBs. Looking ok...so far!