The Peyton Manning Discussion thread

[untrugby]

Quote: Originally Posted by skydog71

There's no reason to draft a QB if your current QB is still good. Nobody knows when Peyton's play will start tailing off. It might be 1 year, it might be 7 years. Until then, the Colts have no business wasting draft picks on backup QB's when they could draft somebody who can contribute immediately.

it worked out pretty good for the packers

[sycodmn]

Draft Luck, and let him sit. It can only help the team, and, because it's Peyton Manning, there's little to no chance of a QB controversy.

If someone steps up with a seriously amazing offer for the pick, then you trade it, otherwise, build for the future.

[kingkilla56]

You take Luck. Every time.

Worst case scenario you clean a team out trading him or Peyton away. In some years

[CM Hooe]

Andrew Luck is a no-brainer in this scenario.

[da ThRONe]

Quote: Originally Posted by Broncos86

I'd take Andrew Luck and have him sit behind Peyton Manning for 4 or 5 years. Let the kid learn from the best.

I would take Luck and trade Manning as soon as I thought Luck was ready. The longer you keep Manning the less you get for him.

[For The Win]

Depends on how much you could get for Luck. If you can get a pro bowler, Top 10 pick in 2012, a 2nd rounder, and then a 1 and 2 in 2013 with some other picks (a 3 and maybe a 5 and 6) you do it because Manning is loved in the city and he still gives them the best chance to win for the next 3 years or so. Surround him with the best talent possible.

[untrugby]

Quote: Originally Posted by For The Win

Depends on how much you could get for Luck. If you can get a pro bowler, Top 10 pick in 2012, a 2nd rounder, and then a 1 and 2 in 2013 with some other picks (a 3 and maybe a 5 and 6) you do it

In what universe could you ever make this trade?

[kingkilla56]

Quote: Originally Posted by untrugby

In what universe could you ever make this trade?

Madden wouldnt even accept that nonsense.