Roster player tendencies Whos the best

[Da_Czar]

What up fam.

Just wondering whose roster has the best player tendencies. Again tendencies not ratings and why do you feel they are the best ?

[bedwardsroy19]

Quote: Originally Posted by Da_Czar

What up fam. Just wondering whose roster has the best player tendencies. Again tendencies not ratings and why do you feel they are the best ?

For what system?

Normally I wouldn't nominate my own work, but on PS3 as far as tendencies go I've yet to see anyone who's gone more in depth in there edits than I have

[turty11]

i was editing almost every tendency on my roster, but once it kept becoming corrupt i said the heck with it

[Da_Czar]

Thanks. I have both so it can be for either system.

[ffaacc03]

Quote: Originally Posted by Da_Czar

What up fam. Just wondering whose roster has the best player tendencies. Again tendencies not ratings and why do you feel they are the best ?

As with ratings, those based on real life data and propperly scaled ... of the top of my mind:

Shot areas tendencies - Slimm23
Shot tendency (sim) - Rashidi (Real 2k insider)*
Freelance & fouls tendencies - Rashidi (Real 2k insider)*
Dribbling and all other tendencies - Chia51*
Hotspots: VTCRB & Hyperballer

*= no longer part of OS but can provide you with their mails.
The rest within OS.

It may seem weird to have all of those great roster editors be good on different areas of the tendency section, but it is just that some of them either havent yet come up with the default roster formula or they consider the rest of the variables not as important.

I have been editing 2k since 2k7, but in a more concious way since 2k10. It was then when I first started to try and find out most of the game formulas and made numerous tests to confirm my findings. I have disected all of their works and many of them have come up with the games default formulas and scales.

Tendencies dictate players behavior and despite whatever amount of tracked meassurable data, people seem to judge that subjectively, as well as ratings.

IMHO, the less subjectivity is applied, the better, as that grants not only a more accurate representation of what players do in real life but also a more balanced game. It is important to note, that not only do we need a good base, but also, we need good roster updates (frequent, unbiased, not selective), that respects the stablished formulas and scales, in sum, such base.

Finally, a list of some of the best overall (ratings & tendencies / oncourt and sim engine) roster editors:
Rashidi
Nogster
Slimm23
Hyperballer
*Youalreadyknow (while I have yet to disect his work, have heard many great things)

P.S:
To those whom I didnt mention but that are aware that I have expressed my admiration before, PLEASE sincerely forgive my fragil memory.

[kongemeier]

As far as tendencies go I'll have to say Ronyell, YouAlreadyKnow and the rest of the Sim World team does an outstanding job!

[StraightBaylien]

For both 2k12 and 2k13, I have not tried a roster that was comparable to VTCRB's projects as far as Tendencies translated to accurate gameplay goes.

Not putting down ANYONE'S work, but the Just Play project for 2k12, and now the Trifecta Project for 2k13 have been what has made the games playable/savable for me.

[beast10]

Sim World and http://www.operationsports.com/forum...te-roster.html

However Sim World does two updates and abandons this site for the past two 2k rosters they put out.