|
If it has people here enthusiastic about an organization that reveres John Stuart Mill, Thomas Paine and Adam Smith, I'm on board.
I don't think the argument wins that potential harm through ignorance and potential harm through hubris are all that different.
What's compelling is the idea that particular documents were kept because of their sensitivity. Hadn't really thought about that. That would indicate that he thought of particular sensitive documents as souvenirs, and there would be a much greater risk of exposure. Kind of a mockery of the whole classification process.
|